Discovery at Carlson·05 How a pandemic affects vaccine supply and demand
How a pandemic affects vaccine supply and demand
Tuesday, May 19, 2020
By its nature, an infectious disease outbreak is almost always a disruptive event. But when it crosses global borders and turns into a pandemic, those disruptions magnify in intensity. Supply chains slow down. Markets tumble. Economic productivity lags.
And that doesn’t include the devastating human toll. The 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) is a current example, but we can also consider the year-long H1N1 flu outbreak that began in April 2009. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that pandemic killed between 151,000 and 475,000 people around the world, with many of those victims in emerging economy nations.
As Carlson School Associate Professor Anant Mishra has discovered, the demand shock brought on by the H1N1 pandemic also had an unanticipated impact on one emerging nation—India. And that impact led to fundamental and lasting changes in a key sector of the country’s economy.
Mishra undertook his research with a number of questions in mind. But one stood out: How does a country’s pharmaceutical supply chain react when the vast majority of its citizens might be under the threat of a major infectious disease outbreak?
Influenza in India
India offered an ideal test case for that query. On one hand, much of the nation’s populace lives in its densely populated urban centers, a situation that helps viruses spread rapidly. “In addition, due to such factors as a lack of disposable income, Indians typically don’t get preventative vaccinations for illnesses such as the flu,” Mishra says. “At the same time, India does have a thriving vaccine manufacturing sector owing largely to its expansive Universal Immunization Program (UIP) and the quest to be self-sufficient in production of primary vaccines. But its domestic flu vaccine market was underdeveloped in 2009. Given the lack of demand, Indian vaccine makers had little incentive to create flu vaccines.”
For years, multinational vaccine manufacturers had stepped in to meet that minimal demand. But the H1N1 outbreak created a massive shock on the Indian market, leading to a sudden and critical need for flu vaccines. And given the nature of the pandemic, that jolt extended around the world, making it practically impossible for the multinationals to adequately service the Indian market. “The size and scope of the pandemic pulled them in numerous directions,” he says. “They had to supply vaccines all over the world, including to their home countries.”
With the situation growing in severity, India’s domestic vaccine manufacturers mobilized quickly. Within a year, they had developed several H1N1 vaccines with the first vaccine launched in June 2010. While those efforts saved lives, Mishra’s research shows they also fundamentally reshaped India’s flu vaccine market. “Production, R&D, and overall investments in supply chain among domestic manufacturers remained high, even after the pandemic subsided,” Mishra explains. “That’s understandable. Once you build capacity and develop expertise, it’s natural to look for ways to become more efficient and capture more of the market."
As a point of comparison, Mishra also examined India’s markets for primary vaccines such as polio, tetanus, and more. None exhibited the same spike as the influenza vaccine makers during the pandemic.
Preparing for the future
As the COVID-19 pandemic painfully illustrates, infectious disease outbreaks will continue to be a global menace—and one that’s not only devastating for emerging economies, but also for developed economies dependent upon foreign manufacturing. “And that raises important questions relating to vaccines, pharmaceutical, and healthcare products,” Mishra notes. “First, can emerging markets really rely on multinationals in times of crisis for these products? Second, can developed economy markets continue to rely on foreign manufacturing for these products? These results indicate that they can’t fully depend on them during large-scale disease outbreaks.

疫情影响疫苗供需
2020年5月19日
传染病的爆发本质上是一个破坏性事件。当传染性疾病跨越国界成为全球性大流行病,其破坏性被放大了。供应链迟滞,市场跌盘,经济生产力下降。
疫病还会造成严重的人员伤亡。新冠肺炎疫情就是一个现行的例子,此外我们还考虑了2009年4月爆发并持续一整年的H1N1流感。美国疾病防控中心估计,H1N1流感在全球造成了151,000至475,000例死亡,其中许多案例来自新兴经济体。
卡尔森学院副教授Anant Mishra发现,在新兴经济体印度,H1N1疫情不仅造成了需求冲击,还带来了意料之外的影响,使该国的一个关键经济部门发生了根本性、持久的改变。
Mishra在研究中考虑了一系列问题,其中最重要的是:当一个国家大部分的公民面临传染病威胁时,该国的药品供应链将作出何种反应?
印度流感
印度的情况十分适合研究上述问题。一方面,该国大部分的人口聚集在拥挤的城镇,非常有利于病毒传播。“此外,由于可支配收入有限等原因,印度人一般不打流感疫苗。同时,印度实施了刺激经济的普遍免疫计划,并追求在基本疫苗方面自给自足,因此疫苗制造业十分繁荣。但是2009年印度的流感疫苗国内市场尚不发达,因此本土的疫苗制造商没有生产流感疫苗的动力。”
多年来,印度依赖国际疫苗制造商来满足流感疫苗的基本要求,但是H1N1的爆发对印度造成了需求冲击,流感疫苗的市场需求突然激增。由于该次疫情是全球性的,世界各地都需要更多疫苗,所以跨国公司无法满足印度市场的需求。“疫情的规模和范围使这些公司疲于奔命,他们需要向全世界供应疫苗,包括他们的祖国。”Mishra如是说。
随着情况不断恶化,印度本土疫苗制造商迅速行动起来。他们一年之内研发出了数种H1N1疫苗,第一支疫苗在2010年6月上市。Mishra的研究表明,这些行动不仅拯救了生命,还从根本上重塑了印度的流感疫苗市场。“即使在疫情补贴结束后,国内生产商依然维持着较高的生产、研发和供应链投资水平。这可以理解。一旦建立起了生产能力和专业技能,你很自然地会想办法提高效率、占据更多市场份额。”
为了比较,Mishra调查了脊椎灰质炎疫苗、破伤风疫苗等基础疫苗的印度市场,但其他疫苗都没有像疫情期间的流感疫苗一样突飞猛进。
备战未来
新冠肺炎疫情揭示了一个令人痛苦的现状,传染病依然是全球性的威胁,它不仅对新兴经济体造成沉重打击,依赖外国制造业的发达经济体也会遭受重创。“这带来了关于疫苗、药品、医疗产品的一系列问题。首先,危机来临时,新兴市场真的能依赖跨国企业?其次,发达国家市场能继续依赖外国制造业吗?这些问题的答案说明,在出现大规模疫病时,不能完全依赖他国的供应链。为了保证本国公民的安全,必须发展自己的疫苗生产能力。”